Planning Poker
- Uses numerical values (Fibonacci sequence)
- Whole team votes simultaneously
- Encourages structured discussion
- More precise and granular estimates
- Best for sprint planning and backlog refinement
- Works well for remote and hybrid teams
Planning Poker and T-Shirt sizing are two popular Agile estimation techniques. Both aim to estimate user stories efficiently, but they are used in different contexts and serve different purposes.
Planning Poker is the right choice when your team needs accurate estimates and shared understanding before committing to a sprint. It works best when:
Learn more about Agile estimation best practices or how Scrum teams use Planning Poker in their ceremonies.
T-Shirt sizing is more appropriate at the start of a project or release cycle, when you need a rough picture of the backlog without investing hours in detailed estimation. Use it when:
Here is how a typical T-Shirt sizing session works when a team has a large, unrefined backlog:
A team of 5 can size 30 to 50 stories in under an hour. This gives the Product Owner a realistic view of the backlog before committing to any detailed estimation.
Neither is strictly better. Many Agile teams use both techniques at different stages of the same project:
Use T-Shirt sizing to identify which stories are small (S), medium (M) or large (L). Then run a Planning Poker session only on the medium and large stories to get a precise story point estimate before they enter a sprint. This avoids spending Planning Poker time on stories that are already obviously small.
Yes. Many teams map sizes to a Fibonacci range: XS = 1–2, S = 3, M = 5–8, L = 13, XL = 21 or more. This gives a rough story point estimate from T-shirt sizing, but it should be refined with Planning Poker before the story enters a sprint.
Planning Poker works better for remote teams because it gives everyone an equal, anonymous vote at the same time. Online tools like Poker-Planning.org replicate this in a browser. T-Shirt sizing can work remotely using polls but offers less structure for discussion.
Yes. Even though T-shirt sizing is faster and less formal, it still benefits from multiple perspectives. A story that looks Small to a developer might look Large to a QA engineer. Doing it as a group surfaces these differences before planning.
No. T-shirt sizing is a quick filter for large backlogs, not a replacement for Planning Poker. Once stories are refined and ready for a sprint, teams need the structured discussion and numerical precision that Planning Poker provides.